生物技术

Accelerating the Industrialization of Synthetic Biology: A New Turning Point for Biomanufacturing in 2026

Editor
9 分钟阅读

The Turning Point in the Commercialization of Synthetic Biology

In January 2026, industry-wide analyses suggest that the global synthetic biology sector has moved beyond the laboratory phase and entered a full-fledged commercialization trajectory. According to the latest report by McKinsey & Company, the synthetic biology market grew from $32.8 billion in 2025 to $42 billion in 2026, a 28% increase, surpassing previous forecasts by 15%. Notably, 67% of the total market growth was driven by actual commercialization revenues rather than research and development investments. This shift signifies that synthetic biology is no longer a future technology but a core driver of current industry dynamics.

Accelerating the Industrialization of Synthetic Biology: A New Turning Point for Biomanufacturing in 2026

Ginkgo Bioworks, based in Boston, USA, is considered a symbolic company of this transition. In its Q4 2025 earnings report, the company announced revenues of $230 million, a 156% increase compared to the same period the previous year. More significant is the change in revenue composition. While R&D service revenues accounted for 78% of total revenue until 2024, this decreased to 52%, whereas revenues related to actual biomanufacturing and production surged to 48%. This is a clear indicator that synthetic biology companies are transitioning their business models from research-centric to production-centric.

Korean biomanufacturers are also actively aligning with this global trend. Samsung Biologics, headquartered in Songdo, Incheon, completed a dedicated synthetic biology-based biopharmaceutical production line by the end of 2025, expanding its annual production capacity from 360,000 liters to 520,000 liters. A company representative stated, “Biopharmaceutical production using synthetic biology reduces production time by 40% and improves yield by 25% compared to traditional methods.” Consequently, Samsung Biologics’ order backlog for Q1 2026 increased by 89% year-on-year to $4.7 billion.

Celltrion is also accelerating its investment in the field of synthetic biology. The company, headquartered in Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, announced that it began full-scale development of synthetic biology-based biosimilars in the second half of 2025 and plans to invest a total of 800 billion won over the next three years. Notably, Celltrion is diversifying its portfolio from its existing focus on antibody biosimilars to developing new therapeutics using synthetic biology. This strategic shift reflects the rapidly increasing importance of synthetic biology in the global biopharmaceutical market.

Achieving Technological Innovation and Cost Efficiency Simultaneously

The key factor driving the commercial success of synthetic biology is the simultaneous achievement of technological innovation and economic efficiency. According to a January 2026 study in the journal Nature Biotechnology, biomanufacturing processes using synthetic biology reduce production costs by an average of 35% compared to traditional chemical synthesis methods. More importantly, production time is significantly reduced. Complex compound production, which previously took 6-8 months, is shortened to 2-3 months through synthetic biology, dramatically improving market responsiveness.

The case of Zymergen, based in Emeryville, California (now acquired by Ginkgo Bioworks), specifically demonstrates this efficiency improvement. The company’s synthetic biology-based industrial enzyme production platform improved productivity by 312% compared to traditional methods. Specifically, enzyme production per liter increased from 2.3 grams to 9.5 grams, and production costs decreased by 63% from $847 per kilogram to $312. This dramatic improvement shows that synthetic biology is becoming a key element of industrial competitiveness beyond mere technological innovation.

Hanmi Pharmaceutical in Korea is achieving notable success in new drug development using synthetic biology. The company, headquartered in Songpa-gu, Seoul, successfully completed preclinical trials for three synthetic biology-based anticancer drug candidates in 2025, announcing that two of these candidates have complex structures that cannot be produced through traditional chemical synthesis. Particularly, the candidate named HM-2847 has a unique three-dimensional structure producible only through synthetic biology, showing 4.7 times improved selectivity compared to existing anticancer drugs. Consequently, Hanmi Pharmaceutical’s R&D investment for 2026 is expected to increase by 23% year-on-year to 234 billion won.

The adoption of synthetic biology in the global pharmaceutical industry is also accelerating. Biogen, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, announced the establishment of a dedicated synthetic biology research center by the end of 2025 and plans to invest $1.2 billion over the next five years. The company is particularly focusing on developing complex protein therapeutics for Alzheimer’s treatment using synthetic biology, which are difficult to produce with traditional methods. Gilead Sciences, based in Foster City, California, also demonstrated active interest in this field by investing a total of $470 million in three synthetic biology startups in 2025.

As a result of these large-scale investments and technological innovations, the market entry of synthetic biology-based products is becoming more pronounced. As of January 2026, the number of synthetic biology-based pharmaceuticals approved by the U.S. FDA has increased by 92% from 12 in 2024 to 23. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) also approved 18 products, a 125% increase year-on-year. This indicates that regulatory authorities are beginning to recognize the safety and efficacy of synthetic biology technologies, and the pace of commercialization is expected to accelerate further.

Market analysts assess that the combination of technological maturity and economic efficiency signifies the entry of the synthetic biology industry into a full-fledged growth phase. Goldman Sachs’ biotech analysis team forecasts that “2026 will be the ’tilting point’ for the synthetic biology industry,” predicting that “as technological innovation and commercial feasibility are simultaneously demonstrated, large-scale capital inflow and market expansion will become full-fledged.”

Global Competitive Landscape and Investment Trends

As global competition in the field of synthetic biology intensifies, the scale of investment by governments and companies is rapidly expanding. In 2025, global venture capital investment in synthetic biology totaled $8.7 billion, a 34% increase from the previous year, with 67% concentrated on companies in the commercialization stage. Notably, the proportion of investment in early-stage R&D has decreased, while investment in companies with actual production and commercialization capabilities has surged. This change in investment patterns clearly shows that the focus of the synthetic biology industry is shifting from research to commercialization.

The United States continues to play a leading role in the field of synthetic biology. In 2025, the number of synthetic biology-related patent applications in the U.S. was 4,267, an 18% increase from the previous year, accounting for 41% of global patent applications. The patent portfolios of major U.S. companies such as Ginkgo Bioworks, Synthetic Genomics, and Twist Bioscience are continuously expanding. Ginkgo Bioworks, for example, filed 327 new patents in 2025 alone, the largest number in a single year since the company’s founding. This competition to secure intellectual property rights is recognized as a key strategy for securing future market dominance.

China is also rapidly catching up in the field of synthetic biology. The Chinese government announced a ‘Five-Year Plan for the Development of Synthetic Biology’ in 2025, pledging to invest a total of $20 billion by 2030. Synthetic biology industry clusters are being established, focusing on Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, with existing biotech companies like BGI Genomics and WuXi Biologics expanding their synthetic biology business areas. China’s synthetic biology market size is expected to grow from $3.2 billion in 2025 to $4.5 billion in 2026, significantly exceeding the global average growth rate.

The European Union is also expanding support for synthetic biology research through the ‘Horizon Europe’ program. In 2025, the EU provided a total of €1.5 billion for synthetic biology-related research projects, which is expected to increase to €1.9 billion in 2026. European companies such as Evonik Industries in Germany, DSM in the Netherlands, and Novartis in Switzerland are also accelerating their investments in the field of synthetic biology. Notably, Evonik completed a dedicated synthetic biology production facility in Essen, Germany, in 2025, with an annual production capacity of 20,000 tons, the largest in Europe.

The Korean government is also recognizing synthetic biology as a next-generation growth engine and is expanding policy support. The Ministry of Science and ICT announced a ‘Synthetic Biology Technology Development and Commercialization Support Plan’ in 2025, pledging to invest a total of 1.2 trillion won by 2030. Of this, 60% will be allocated to support commercialization by companies, and 40% will be invested in basic research. Additionally, specialized industrial complexes for synthetic biology are being established in Pangyo, Daedeok, and Osong to promote the clustering of related companies. With this government support, Korea’s synthetic biology market is expected to grow from $800 million in 2025 to $1.2 billion in 2026, a 50% increase.

Investments in the field of synthetic biology by venture capital and private equity firms are also significantly increasing. In 2025, the world’s largest dedicated synthetic biology fund, ‘Synthetic Biology Fund III,’ was established with a scale of $2.7 billion, an 80% increase compared to the previous fund. Additionally, mergers and acquisitions by existing pharmaceutical and chemical companies are becoming more active. In 2025, there were a total of 23 M&A transactions in the field of synthetic biology, with a transaction volume of $15.6 billion, representing increases of 35% and 67% year-on-year, respectively. This active investment and M&A activity indicates the increasing maturity of the synthetic biology industry.

In the global competitive landscape, a notable point is that specialization strategies by technology field are becoming more distinct. U.S. companies are strong in platform technology and software, European companies are focusing on sustainable chemical material production, China is showing competitiveness in mass production and commercialization capabilities, and Korea is securing a unique position in the biopharmaceutical manufacturing field. These regional specialization strategies are expected to form a division of labor structure in the future global synthetic biology ecosystem, with cooperation and competition among companies from different countries expected to expand simultaneously.

Industry experts evaluate that 2026 will be a crucial year in determining the global competitive landscape of the synthetic biology industry. Based on the investments and technological development achievements so far, market dominance is likely to be determined over the next 5-10 years, and as a result, investment competition among governments and companies is expected to become more intense. Securing intellectual property rights in key technology fields and building commercialization capabilities are analyzed to be the core elements of competition.

In summary, the state of the synthetic biology industry in 2026 can be evaluated as having entered a full-fledged industrialization phase, with technological maturity and commercial feasibility simultaneously demonstrated. Particularly, the reduction in production costs and efficiency improvements have been proven with concrete figures, accelerating the paradigm shift in traditional chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Amidst intense global competition, large-scale investments by governments and companies are continuing, forecasting explosive growth in the synthetic biology market in the coming years. Korean companies must actively seek new opportunities in the era of synthetic biology, leveraging their existing competitiveness in the biomanufacturing field.

*The content of this article is for informational purposes only and is not intended as investment solicitation or advice. Investment decisions should be made at the individual’s discretion and responsibility.*

#Ginkgo Bioworks #Zymergen #Samsung Biologics #Celltrion #Hanmi Pharmaceutical #Biogen #Gilead Sciences

Editor

Leave a Comment

Related Articles

生物技术市场的新转折点:AI驱动的新药开发与个性化治疗的快速扩展

到2025年,生物技术行业因人工智能驱动的新药开发和个性化治疗方法的商业化,迎来了前所未有的变革期。全球生物技术市场规模突破1.2万亿美元,韩国企业在全球竞争中也崭露头角。

生物科技产业的AI革命:从2026年药物发现到个性化治疗

AI可用于药物开发多个阶段的数据生成和分析。FDA与EMA的药物开发良好AI实践原则要求明确使用情境,并根据风险开展验证和性能评估。这些原则并未认定AI能将所有药物开发周期平均缩短70%,也未认定2026年AI生物科技市场达到1200亿美元。市场规模数据应附有明确界定范围和方法的来源。 目前,AI在生物科技产业中的应用主要分为三个领域。首先是加速药物发现和开发,AI应用于从分子设计到临床试验优化的全过程。其次是个性化治疗的开发,基于基因分析和患者数据的精准医学正在成为现实。第三是生物制造过程的优化,通过AI实现质量管理和产量提升。这些变化直接影响了生物科技企业的研发投资模式,截至2026年上半年,主要生物科技企业的AI相关研发投资同比平均增长了85%。 在药物发现领域,AI的影响力尤为显著。自英国DeepMind开发的AlphaFold以来,蛋白质结构预测技术彻底改变了药物设计的范式。截至2026年1月,AlphaFold数据库中已注册超过2亿个蛋白质结构,利用这些数据挖掘药物候选物的数量较2025年增长了120%。美国加州的Scripps Research宣布,利用AI比传统方法提前6个月,在18个月内发现了针对COVID-19变异病毒的新治疗候选物。 AI基础药物开发的当前趋势和成就 目前,全球制药公司正在大幅增加对AI基础药物开发平台的投资。瑞士的罗氏(Roche)宣布将在2025年底前向AI药物发现部门投资15亿美元,相当于其整体研发预算的12%。美国的强生(J&J)也计划从2026年起三年内总计投入25亿美元用于AI基础新药开发。这些大规模投资的背景是AI确实显示出了可见的成果。 具体的成就指标显示,利用AI挖掘药物候选物的成功率从传统方法的12%提高到28%,翻了一倍多。此外,从临床前阶段进入临床一期所需的时间也从平均4.2年缩短到2.8年。美国马萨诸塞州的Moderna宣布,通过AI基础的mRNA疫苗开发平台,将新型传染病疫苗的开发时间从传统的10-15年缩短到6个月以内。这被认为是AI在疫情情况下潜力的明确展示。 韩国的生物科技产业也积极参与这场AI革命。总部位于京畿道松岛的三星生物制剂宣布,自2025年下半年起引入AI基础生物药品生产优化系统,将生产产量平均提高了15%。此外,位于仁川的Celltrion通过建立AI基础的生物仿制药开发平台,将开发时间从原来的7-8年缩短到4-5年。这些成就对于韩国生物科技公司在全球市场上获得竞争力起到了重要作用。 特别值得注意的是AI基础生物科技初创公司的增长势头。截至2026年第一季度,全球AI-生物初创公司的风险投资总额达到87亿美元,较2025年同期增长了65%。其中约40%投资于药物发现平台,25%投资于个性化治疗开发,其余35%投资于诊断和生物制造优化。在韩国,KAIST出身的研究团队创立的AI新药开发初创公司接连在B轮融资中获得大规模投资,备受关注。 个性化治疗和精准医学的现实化 根据美国国家癌症研究所的说明,生物标志物检测可能有助于依据患者癌症的特征选择治疗,但其应用和结果会因癌种、生物标志物和疗法而异,精准医疗尚未成为大多数患者的常规治疗。因此,不能笼统声称基于AI基因分析的个性化治疗比标准治疗使各种癌症的五年生存率平均提高23%。 这些成就的核心在于AI的模式识别能力。目前,AI系统可以同时分析患者的基因信息、生活习惯数据、临床记录等数十万个变量,提出最佳治疗方案。总部位于瑞士巴塞尔的诺华(Novartis)宣布,利用AI在CAR-T细胞治疗开发中,将患者个性化制造时间从原来的4-6周缩短到2-3周。这对提高患者生存率产生了直接影响。 在精准医学领域,韩国企业的成就也值得关注。总部位于首尔江南区的Macrogen通过AI基础的基因组分析平台开发了亚洲人特化疾病预测模型。该模型在糖尿病、高血压、痴呆等主要慢性疾病方面较西方人模型提高了15-20%的预测准确度。此外,通过与分当首尔大学医院的合作,开发了反映韩国人基因特性的个性化抗癌药选择算法,正在临床应用中。 个性化治疗的市场规模也在迅速扩大。全球精准医学市场从2025年的950亿美元增长到2026年的1180亿美元,增长了24.2%,其中AI基础解决方案占比达到35%。特别是亚太地区的增长率尤为显著,以韩国、日本、中国为中心的该地区精准医学市场在2026年达到280亿美元,较前一年增长了42%。这被分析为亚洲各国政府的精准医学培育政策与高水平IT基础设施相结合的结果。 然而,个性化治疗的普及仍面临挑战。最大的问题是高昂的治疗费用,目前AI基础个性化治疗的费用是标准治疗的3-5倍。此外,数据隐私和安全问题、医务人员的AI应用能力不足等也被指出是需要解决的课题。为应对这些问题,各国政府和医疗机构正在着手相关制度的整备和人才培养。韩国政府也宣布从2026年起为期五年、规模2000亿韩元的精准医学专业人才培养投资计划。 在生物制造领域,AI的影响力也在扩大。传统上,生物药品制造包括复杂的生物过程,质量管理要求严格。然而,通过引入AI基础的实时监控和预测系统,制造过程的稳定性和效率得到了显著提高。总部位于美国伊利诺伊州的艾伯维(AbbVie)宣布,通过AI基础的制造优化系统,将生物药品生产产量平均提高了18%,不良率减少了60%。 这些成就对生物药品的供应稳定性和价格竞争力具有重要意义。特别是在新冠疫情后,生物药品供应链的重要性凸显,AI基础的制造优化被视为国家层面的战略课题。韩国的三星生物制剂也在松岛第三工厂建立了AI基础的智能制造系统,并于2025年下半年开始正式运营。该系统通过实时质量监控预测制造过程中的变量并自动调整,以确保产品质量的一致性。 目前生物科技产业的AI引入有几个主要动力。首先是计算性能的急剧提升。基于GPU的高性能计算的发展使复杂的分子模拟和大规模数据分析以现实的成本成为可能。其次是生物数据的爆炸性增长。随着基因组分析成本的持续下降,积累的生物数据量呈指数级增长,为AI模型的学习提供了原料。第三是监管环境的改善。包括FDA在内的各国监管机构正在整理AI基础医疗设备和治疗方法的批准指南,使商业化路径更加明确。 在投资方面,生物科技AI领域也显示出活跃的动向。截至2026年第一季度,全球生物科技领域的风险投资中,AI相关投资占比为32%,较2020年的8%增长了4倍。特别是大型制药公司对AI生物科技初创公司的并购活动日益活跃。2025年一年内,规模超过10亿美元的AI生物科技并购达成了12起,总交易规模达到180亿美元。这表明生物科技行业将AI视为核心竞争力而不仅仅是工具。 然而,在AI与生物科技的融合过程中出现的课题也不容忽视。最重要的问题是数据质量和标准化。AI模型的性能很大程度上取决于学习数据的质量,而医疗数据可能因收集机构和方法的不同而存在偏差。此外,种族、性别、年龄等引起的数据偏向问题也需解决。目前大多数医疗AI模型基于西方人数据开发,应用于亚洲人时准确性可能下降。为应对这一问题,各国正在构建反映本国国民特性的医疗数据库。…

ADC治疗的新突破?Orum Therapeutics的下一代平台技术

ADC(抗体-药物偶联物)治疗市场正如火如荼。截至2025年11月26日,全球ADC市场规模已达到约120亿美元,并以13.2%的年均增长率迅速扩张。在这种情况下,韩国生物技术公司Orum Therapeutics(总部位于首尔)雄心勃勃地表示要克服现有ADC技术的局限性。特别是,他们正在开发的ORM-1153和ORM-1023采取了何种差异化的策略,显示出他们追求的是根本性的技术创新,而不仅仅是简单的“跟随”开发。 据报道,Orum Therapeutics建立了一个独特的平台,以解决现有ADC技术的核心局限性。目前主导ADC市场的产品,如罗氏(Roche,瑞士)的Kadcyla和辉瑞(Pfizer,美国)的Besponsa,存在的问题——例如药物-抗体比率(DAR)调节困难、连接子稳定性问题,尤其是由于肿瘤特异性不足引起的副作用——似乎正是他们试图从根本上改善的方面。 我个人最关注的是,Orum Therapeutics不仅仅是在改良现有的ADC结构,而是开发了一种全新的偶联方式和有效载荷传递系统。他们的技术方法显示,他们使用了部位特异性偶联(site-specific conjugation)技术,而不是传统的非特异性偶联方式,这与目前市场上被认为最先进的西雅图基因(Seattle Genetics,美国)的方法有所不同。 从市场数据来看,目前全球获批的ADC治疗药物仅有约15种,但正在进行临床试验的ADC超过500种。在这些产品中,能够成功进入市场的仅是极少数。Orum Therapeutics要在这种激烈的竞争中生存下来,需要明确的差异化优势。从文章中提到的ORM-1153和ORM-1023的开发现状来看,它们针对不同的目标和适应症,似乎在多元化产品组合方面采取了战略性的方法。 全球ADC市场的竞争格局与技术挑战 目前在全球ADC市场中,罗氏以约35%的市场份额位居第一,而大冢制药(Daiichi Sankyo,日本)凭借Enhertu迅速增长,占据了约25%的市场份额。特别是大冢制药,自2019年推出Enhertu以来,年均销售增长率超过150%,成为ADC市场的游戏规则改变者。分析他们的成功因素,显著改善的治疗指数和扩展的适应症是关键。 ADC的毒性和耐药性会因靶点、抗体、连接子、载荷、癌种和治疗方案而异。关于毒性的系统综述和耐药机制的综述显示,部分ADC可能出现严重不良事件和获得性耐药,但这些证据不支持把30%至50%的单一严重不良事件发生率或6至12个月的统一耐药时间套用于整个类别。安全性和疗效应依据具体产品的批准信息和试验结果判断。 虽然Orum Therapeutics如何克服这些现有的局限性,目前具体数据有限,但从他们强调的“下一代ADC平台”这一表述来看,他们似乎在尝试一种范式转变,而不仅仅是简单的改良。特别是ORM-1153,据说是针对HER2阳性实体瘤,这一领域已经有Trastuzumab Deruxtecan(Enhertu)和Trastuzumab Emtansine(Kadcyla)等强有力的竞争对手。在这种情况下,要实现差异化,需要相当创新的方法。 从韩国生物技术公司的ADC开发现状来看,除了Orum Therapeutics,还有Apta…